- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2023
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- CMP(MD) 1272/2023
Judgment
CMP(MD) No.1272 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN CMP(MD) No.1272 of 2023 in CRP(MD)SR.NO.6505 of 2023 ALLOYCIUS MARIA NAVAMANI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER Vs 1 SUNIL KUMAR 2 ANTHONY PRIESTUS PRATHEEB RAJA, ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 242 days in filing the above civil revision petition against the order made in I.A.No. 1 of 2020 in O.S.No. 9 of 2013 dated 04-12-2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil pending disposal of the civil revision petition. PRAYER IN CRP(MD)SR.NO.6505 of 2023: To set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 04.12.2021 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.NO. 9 of 2013 on the file of the Learned Iind Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil by allowing this revision petition. ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C. EZHILARASU, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.S.RAJASEKAR, Advocate on behalf of the 1st Respondent and of MR.MURUGANANTHAN, Advocate for the 2nd Respondent, the court made the following order:- The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 242 days against the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.9 of 2013, dated 04.12.2021 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil.
¶2It appears that the petitioner was ill and was in-deposed due to paralytic attack. The delay of 242 days has been attempted to explained by the petitioner by stating that the petitioner was in CMP(MD) No.1272 of 2023 treatment from 02.01.2017 after the order passed by the Trial Court, the petitioner could not file the civil revision petition in time.
¶3Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
¶4I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of this petition. I am satisfied with the reasons stated therein. Therefore, this petition is allowed on terms: The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand and Five Hundred only) to the credit of Chief Justice Relief Fund, Madras High Court, Madras within a period of four weeks. A memo to that effect shall be filed.
¶5On such filing of cost memo, Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition and post the case for admission. sd/- 24/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. SN TO THE II ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, NAGERCOIL. COPY TO 1 THE SECTION OFFICER, (CHIEF JUSTICE RELIEF FUND) ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 2 THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 3 THE SECTION OFFICER, JUDICIAL SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1272 of 2023 in CRP(MD)SR.NO.6505 of 2023 Date :24/04/2023 PKP/MMS/SAR-1/05.05.2023/ 2P/5C
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.