VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Sridhar v. The Thasildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 January 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2179/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue a separate patta in the petitioner's name in Old Survey No.362/3 (New Survey Nos.81/2B and 81/2A), to an extent of 3 cents, as per the new FMB dated 30.04.2024, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.12.2025.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the lawful owner and is in possession of the subject property. He is entitled to a separate patta in respect of an extent of 3 cents in Old Survey No.362/3 (New Survey Nos.81/2B and 81/2A). Pursuant to the new FMB dated 30.04.2024, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 22.12.2025 requesting issuance of a separate patta. However, the respondent has not considered the said representation till date. Hence, this Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and issue a separate patta within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law.

¶5Recording the aforesaid submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.12.2025, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be considered and disposed of after conducting an enquiry. The respondent is directed to provide reasonable opportunity during such enquiry to the petitioner and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision. Needless to state that in the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

29.01.2026 smn2 To:- The Thasildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

29.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER S.Sridhar ... Petitioner -vs- The Thasildar, Kalligudi Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue a separate patta in petitioner's name in Old Survey No.362/3 (New Survey No.81/2B and Survey No. 81/2A) to an extent of 3 cents, as per the new FMB dated 30.04.2024 by considering the representation dated 22.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.