VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Mathavi v. The Executive Engineer

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 April 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2642/2020

Judgment

ORDER The above writ petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2020 to remove or shift the alignment of overhead electric line passing over the patta land comprised in S.Nos.359/3A and 359/3B at Kampiliyampatti Village, Dindigul Taluk.

2.When the matter had come up, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has produced a letter dated 03.02.2020 issued by the third respondent to the petitioner rejecting the request for shifting the overhead electric line stating that if there is any dispute, the parties could work out their remedy before the civil Court.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not received any rejection order.

4.Considering the fact that orders have already been passed on the representation of the petitioner, no further order needs to be passed in the above writ petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous, accordingly. The third respondent is directed to serve a copy of the rejection order dated 03.02.2020 upon the petitioner forthwith. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Speaking : Yes / No

06.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm

P.T.ASHA, J. mm

06.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA V.Mathavi ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Meenachinayaganpatti, Dindigul. 2.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Meenachinayaganpatti, Dindigul. 3.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Chiluvathur, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to consider petitioner representation dated 08.01.2020 and to remove or shift the alignment of overhead electric line passing over the patta land comprised in Sy.No.359/3A and 359/3B at Kampiliyampatti Village, Dindigul Taluk within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.