VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Gopal v. The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 April 2023
Bench
R. Suresh Kumarauthor, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
HCP(MD) 160/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The petitioner is the father of the detenu. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by him to call for the records pertaining to the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent made in M.H.S.Confdl No.64 of 2022, dated 13.06.2022 and quash the same and consequently set the detenu by name Thiru. Ayyanar, (Male aged 26 years) S/o. Gopal (TPDA No.7261) who is confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai at liberty.

¶2Heard Mr.R.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who would point out that, there are two accused in the ground case, insofar as the co-accused one Subramani is concerned, H.C.P. (MD) No.1278 of 2022 has been filed, which has been considered and allowed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 20.02.2023.

¶3Insofar as the similarity is concerned, Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondents, also fairly submitted that, insofar as the co-accused is concerned, since the said Habeas Corpus Petition was allowed, it is for the Court to take a decision.

¶4We have gone through the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 20.02.2023, where the Division Bench has passed the following order:- "4. This Court, on perusing the records, finds that there is one adverse case against the petitioner registered in the year 2019 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 364(A), 394, 397 and 506(ii) IPC. Since case referred by the detaining authority were bail was granted is not a similar case, this Court finds that the detention order suffers non-application of mind.

¶5In fine, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detention order passed in M.H.S.Confdl No.66/2022, dated

13.06.2022, by the 2nd respondent, is set aside. Consequently, the detenu viz., Muthukumar alias Chainkumar, S/o.Velusamy, aged about 35 years, who is now detained in Central Prison, Palayamkottai, is directed to be released forthwith, unless his presence or custody or detention is required in connection with any other case."

¶5Since the present detenu is also similarly placed, as as against him also one adverse case and one ground case for the same offences were pending, for which, the said detenu viz., V.Subramani was able to successfully challenge the detention order and the H.C.P.(MD) No.1287 of 2022 since was allowed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated

20.02.2022, following the same analogy, we feel that, this Habeas Corpus Petition can also be allowed.

¶6In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The order of detention passed by the second respondent, in M.H.S. Confdl. No.64 of 2022 dated 13.06.2022, is set aside. Consequently, the detenu, namely, Ayyanar, son of Gopal, aged about 26 years, who is now detained at Central Prison, Palayamkottai, is directed to be released forthwith unless his presence or custody or detention is required in connection with any other case. (R.S.K., J.) & (K.K.R.K, J.)

17.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No SJ To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The District Collector & District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sendhamaram Police Station, Tenkasi District.

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. SJ H.C.P.(MD)No.160 of 2023

17.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.160 of 2023 S.Gopal ... Petitioner / Father of detenu Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The District Collector & District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 3.The Inspector of Police, Sendhamaram Police Station, Tenkasi District. 4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records pertaining to the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent made in M.H.S.Confdl No.64 of 2022 dated 13.06.2022 and quash the same and consequently set the detenue by name Thiru. Ayyanar, (Male aged 26 years) S/o. Gopal (TPDA No.7261) who is confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.