VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Valli R v. The Tahsildar

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2308/2022

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus seeking interference with the communication bearing Na.Ka.No. 451/2022/A3, dated 25.01.2022 issued by the respondent / Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District and for a direction against the respondent to issue fresh Legal Heirship Certificate.

¶2In the affidavit filed, the petitioner had stated that she is the second wife of Ramaiya, who died on 23.07.2021. She had applied for Legal Heirship Certificate. That was rejected by the respondent claiming that she, as the second wife cannot seek that particular status.

¶3In the affidavit, it had been stated that however the status of the son born through Ramaiya should be recognised.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner also stated that the son can be recognised as a legal heir.

¶5The legal heirs of the deceased Ramaiya would be his first wife Sumithrai, the son Sakthivel, who had died as a Bachelor in the year 1991, the daughter Durgadevi and the son of the petitioner Rajavelu.

¶6In view of this fact, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent herein who has to consider G.O.(Ms)No.478 introduced by the Government on 22.09.2022 and examine the credentials of the legal heirs of the deceased Ramaiya and then issue fresh Legal Heirship Certificate after due enquiry.

¶7The legal heirs of the deceased Ramaiya would be the first wife Sumithrai, the deceased son Sakthivel, who died as Bachelor, the daughter Durgadevi and the son of the petitioner Rajavelu.

¶8The necessary Legal Heirship Certificate in this regard may be issued within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Since the impugned order is set aside, the Writ Petition stands allowed and the matter is remitted back to the Tahsildar. There shall be no order as to costs.

24.03.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji To The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. vji

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN R.Valli ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent relating to the impugned communication bearing Na.Ka.No.451/2022/A3 dated 25.01.2022 and quash the same, consequently direct the respondent to issue a Legal Heirship Certificate for Serial Nos.1, 2 and 4 of the application only in respect of the petitioner's son Rajavelu along with first wife Sumithrai and her daughter Durgadevi within a stipulated period of time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Siva Ilayaraja For Respondent : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.