VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Muthukumar v. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4308/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to direct the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 to enquire into allegations of corrupt practices and other illegalities committed by the respondents in the tender process held on 07.10.2025 with reference to tender notice No. 33/2025-26/HDO and connected tender process held on 07.10.2025 take appropriate action for causing loss to the Government exchequer by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2025.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents. By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a Class I Contractor. He has given a representation to the official respondents to conduct enquiry with regard to the corrupt practice by the 7th respondent and their officials. However, since the said representation was not considered so far, the petitioner is before this Court with this writ petition.

¶4The learned Government Advocate for the respondents would submit that since the petitioner was neither granted any contract nor any work order, in order to take revenge against the respondents, the petitioner has preferred a complaint and has also filed the present writ petition.

¶5I have considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6The petitioner is the Class I Contractor. He was not issued with any contract by the respondents. When he lost the contract, it appears that in order to take revenge against the private respondents,such representation was made alleging that the respondents involved in corrupt practice without there being any supportive documents and documentary evidence to substantiate their case. Though it is averred that there are documents available, it has not been produced. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to issue any mandamus as sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

17.02.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To

¶1The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Secretariat, Chennai..

¶2The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai..

¶3The Director of Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Chennai..

¶4The Director General,, Highways Department, 76, Sardar Patel Road, Hrs Campus Guindy, Chennai.

¶5The Chief Engineer Highways Department, Chennai.

¶6The Superintendenting Engineer, Construction and Maintenance,, Tiruchirapalli.

¶7The Divisional Engineer,, Construction and Maintenance, Tiruchirapalli..

¶8The Divisional Engineer,, Quality Control, Tiruchirapalli.. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J RR ORDER IN WP(MD) No.4308 of 2026 Date : 17/02/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 17/02/2026 CORAM The Hon`ble Mr.Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP(MD). No.4308 of 2026 R.Muthukumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Secretariat, Chennai.. 2. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai.. 3. The Director of Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Chennai.. 4. The Director General,, Highways Department, 76, Sardar Patel Road, Hrs Campus Guindy, Chennai. 5. The Chief Engineer Highways Department, Chennai. 6. The Superintendenting Engineer, Construction and Maintenance,, Tiruchirapalli. 7. The Divisional Engineer,, Construction and Maintenance, Tiruchirapalli.. 8. The Divisional Engineer,, Quality Control, Tiruchirapalli.. 9. Illamvazhuthi,, The Superintending Engineer(Highways), Construction and Maintenance, Tiruchirapalli. 10. Matheswaran,, The Divisional Engineer, Construction and Maintenance, Tiruchirapalli.. ... Respondents PRAYER :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus thereby direct the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 to enquire into allegations of corrupt practices and other illegalities committed by the respondents in the tender process held on 07.10.2025 with reference to tender notice No. 33/2025-26/HDO and connected tender process held on 07.10.2025 take appropriate action for causing loss to the Government exchequer by considering the petitioners representation dated 11.10.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl. side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.