VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M. Latha v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons and Correctional Services, Trichy Range,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, R. Poornima
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 487/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. IlanthiraiyanFollow R. Poornima

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] The prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in NO.RO/TRY/570/2025-CA dated 08.01.2026 and direct the first respondent to grant 21 days ordinary leave without police escort to the petitioner's son namely Siva, S/o.Murugesan @ Kandhan aged about 35 years, Life Convict Prisoner PID No.161935 confined at Central Prison, Trichy.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that her son was convicted by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Presiding Officer[Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases) Mahila Court, Pudukottai in S.C. No.165 of 2017 on 23.04.2019 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 304(1)r/w.149 of IPC. Aggrieved over the same, the convict has also filed an appeal before this Court in Crl.A(MD) No.212 of 2019 and the same was confirmed by this Court on 02.08.2022. The petitioner submitted an application seeking ordinary leave for a period of 21 days. After considering the request made by the petitioner, the first respondent granted ordinary leave to the petitioner's son with escort. The petitioner being a poor person, could not afford the cost for escorts.

¶3In view of the above, the condition imposed in the order dated

08.01.2026 directing the convict to go on ordinary leave with escort is modified and he shall go on ordinary leave without escort. However, the convict is directed to comply with the usual conditions imposed by the jail authorities and he should also report before the fourth respondent police daily at 05.30 p.m. He shall duly comply with the conditions and return to the prison on expiry of the leave period.

¶4Accordingly, the order of the first respondent dated 08.01.2026 is quashed in sofar as the ordering escort alone and the Writ Petition is disposed of.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.]

30.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

aav To:

¶1The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons and Correctional Services Trichy Range, Race Course Road Trichy-620 023

¶2The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Trichy-620 020

¶3The Superintendent of Police O/o.The Superintendent of Police Pudukottai District

¶4The Inspector of Police Annavasal Police Station Pudukottai District

¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. oG.K.ILANTHIRAIYANoo,oJo. and oR.POORNIMAoo,oJo. aav W.P.Crl.(MD)oNo.487oofo2026

30.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA M.Latha ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons and Correctional Services Trichy Range, Race Course Road Trichy- 620 023 2. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison,Trichy- 620 020 3. The Superintendent of Police O/o.The Superintendent of Police Pudukottai District 4. The Inspector of Police Annavasal Police Station Pudukottai District ..Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings in NO.RO/TRY/570/2025-CA dated 08.01.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to grant 21 days ordinary leave without police escort to the petitioner's son namely Siva, S/o.Murugesan @ Kandhan aged about 35 years, Life Convict Prisoner PID No.161935 confined at Central Prison, Trichy. For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.S. Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.