- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 August 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3088/2021
Judgment
ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2.On 14.08.2023, though fresh notice to R3 and R4 was ordered, till today, the petitioner has not taken any steps either to pay batta or to send private notice.
3.In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To
¶1The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.
¶2The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Madurai City, Thilagar Thidal Police Station, Madurai.
¶3The Inspector of Police, B1-Vilakkuthoon (Crime) Police Station, Madurai City.
¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.DHANABAL, J. PNM ORDER IN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.2466 and 2467 of 2021
29.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and W.M.P(MD)Nos.2466 and 2467 of 2021 The Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Limited., Jeeva Nagar Branch, Jeeva Nagar, Madurai – 625 011. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Madurai City, Thilagar Thidal Police Station, Madurai. 3. The Inspector of Police, B1-Vilakkuthoon (Crime) Police Station, Madurai City. 4. Muthukumar 5. The Regional Manager, Bank of Baroda, Madurai Region, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent, under proceeding No. Nil dt 06.02.2021, pertaining to mandating the petitioner to handover the jewels and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi (R1-R3) Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.M.Prakash (R5)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.