- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 April 2023
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3493/2020
Judgment
ORDER It is informed that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous, in the light of the order having been pronounced which is the subject matter of challenging in W.P.(MD) No.10842 of 2021 filed by the petitioner and no further orders are required in this writ petition.
¶2Recording the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
28.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr
P.T.ASHA, J. abr To The District Collector, Representing District Industries Centre, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. Dated: 28.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.2959 and 2960 of 2020 V.Vembaiyan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.HDB Financial Services Ltd., Rep., by its Authorised Officer, Ground Floor, Zenith House, Opp. Mahalaxmi Race Court, K.K.Marg Mahalakshmi, Mumbai-400 034. 2.HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd., Rep., by its Authorised Officer, 1st Floor, HDFC House, 165/166, Backbay Reclamation, H.T.Parekh Marg, Mumbai-400 020. 3.The Sole Arbitrator, Shri.Rajendra Brijmohan Agarwal, (Retd., District Judge), Marathon Complex, Om Shiv Kirupa CHS D-Wing, Shop No.21, Karva Nagar, Kanjumarg East, Mumbai-400 042. 4.The District Collector, Representing District Industries Centre, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 5.The Branch Manager, HDB Financial Private Limited, Chinnaiyah Street, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 6.The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, 3rd Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad-500 004. .. Respondents [R6 – impleaded vide order dated 10.03.2020 made in W.M.P. (MD) No.4313 of 2020 in W.P.(MD) No.3493 of 2020] Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records from the 2nd respondent's proceedings dated NIL with regard to Policy No. 2111202042754900 Claim No.C211119000123-1 assessing the damage caused to the petitioner at Rs.6,720/- and to quash the same with a consequential direction to indemnify the petitioner for Rs.9,50,000/- as assessed by 4th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.PT.S.Narendravasan For R4 : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.