VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Anbalagan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 April 2023
Bench
S Justice R. Tharaniauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 2930/2021

Judgment

O RDER

This petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.547 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent police

¶2This matter was taken up in the list on 07.06.2022,

14.06.2022, 21.06.2022, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners.

¶3This matter was listed before me on 24.04.2023 and on

27.04.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the case was posted to 28.04.2023, under the caption "for arguments or for orders". Even today, ie. on 28.04.2023, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶4This Petition is pending for the from the year 2021. There is no use in keeping the case pending any further. Hence, this Petition is dismissed for default.

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

28.04.2023 Ls

To

1.The Inspector of Police, Checkanurani Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.THARANI. J. Ls

28.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.2930 of 2021 1.Anbalagan 2.Chinnakaman 3.Kasinathan 4.C.V.Ponrajesh ... Petitioners / accused Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Checkanurani Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.547 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.Ramesh ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Crime No.547 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Prabhu Public Prosecutor for R1 : Mr.K.Prabhu for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.