VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Nakesh v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 1778/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice S.Srimathy

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Nakesh ... Petitioner/Accused

Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Trichy District. (Crime No. 723 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Arun.B

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.723 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 309 (4) of BNS, in Crime No.723 of 2025 , seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with the other accused, committed theft of the defacto complainant's bike Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the co-accused has already been remanded and that the stolen property has been recovered. He further submitted that ten previous cases are pending against the petitioner, out of which six are of a similar nature. Therefore, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the stolen property has already been recovered, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, this Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders;

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023. (S S Y J)

30.01.2026 jbr TO

¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy

¶2The Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Trichy District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY,J jbr ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1778 of 2026 Date : 30/01/2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.