VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Ramesh Pandian v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 July 2023
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3052/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.5 of 2022, registered by the 1st respondent police for the offence under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, dated 27.09.2022,

¶2After numbering the Crl.O.P this case was listed on

20.02.2023. Thereafter, at the request of the petitioner counsel the matter was adjourned periodically on 07.03.2023, 30.03.2023 and

03.07.2023 respectively. On 03.07.2023 when the matter was taken up for hearing the learned counsel undertake to argue the case on

17.07.2023 and this Court also directed that no further adjournment will be given on that day. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

18.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

¶1The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Dindigul District,

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P(MD)No.e3052eofe2023 K.K.oRAMAKRISHNAN.oJ., trp Orderomadeoin Crl.O.P(MD)No.3052oofo2023oand Crl.M.P(MD).No.2803oofo2023 Datedo:o18.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.3052 of 2023 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.2803 of 2023 R.Ramesh Pandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State through The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Dindigul District, (Crime No.5 of 2022) 2.Perumalsamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the impugned FIR in Crime No.5 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent, dated 27.09.2022 and quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For 1st Respondent : Mr.T. Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.