VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Balamurugan.J v. The Union of India, Rep. by Its

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4085/2021

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to withdraw / drop the acquisition proceedings and to reconvey the lands that were acquired from the petitioners by considering the representation made by the petitioner on

11.09.2020.

¶2Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶3The case of the petitioners is that they had purchased the subject property through a registered sale deed dated 04.09.2019 registered as Document No.3294 of 2019. The petitioners came to know that the National Highways have proceeded to include the subject property during the acquisition proceedings. According to the petitioners, neither the petitioners nor their vendors have received any compensation amount and that apart, the land that was acquired has not been utilized. Therefore, the petitioners made a representation for reconveyance of the subject property. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

¶4In the considered view of this Court, if the compensation amount has not been received by the petitioners or their vendors, it has to be independently agitated by the petitioners in the manner known to law. That cannot be a ground to seek for the reconveyance of the land. Even in the counter affidavit that has been filed by the National Highways Department, it is stated that the compensation amount has been paid to the vendors of the petitioners. It is not necessary for this Court to go into this issue.

¶5The only issue that requires consideration of this Court is as to whether the petitioners are entitled for reconveyance of the land that was acquired under the National Highways Act and it has been repeatedly held that there is no provision under the National Highways Act for reconveyance of the acquired land to the land owners. The law on this issue is no longer res integra. Useful reference can be made to the Judgment of this Court in the case of G.Poosanam Vs. the Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, No.7E, 5th Cross Jakkappan Nagar, Krishnagiri and others in W.P.16186 of 2011 dated

16.09.2020. In the absence of any specific provision under the Act, there is no scope for the respondents to reconvey the lands that have been acquired. This Court cannot issue any directions beyond the scope of the National Highways Act and hence, the relief sought for by the petitioners cannot be granted by this Court.

¶6Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

12.10.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The District Collector Madurai District.

2.The District Revenue Officer Cum-Project Competent Authority Land Acquisition (NHAI), Virudhunagar.

3.The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Agricultural Engineering Department, Madurai Region, T.P.K.Road, Madurai-625 011

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg

12.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.3279 of 2021 1.J.Balamurugan 2.J.Velmurugan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District. 3.The District Revenue Officer Cum-Project Competent Authority Land Acquisition (NHAI), Virudhunagar. 4.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Madurai. 5.The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Agricultural Engineering Department, Madurai Region, T.P.K.Road, Madurai-625 011. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to withdraw/drop the petitioners' land situated in Survey Nos.1/14A1 and 3/12A of Vilacheri Village, Nagamaladipudukkottai, Madurai District, measuring an extent of 22 1/2 cents from the Additional Land Acquisition proceedings. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Senthilvelan For R-1 : Mr.S.Jeyasingh, Senior Panel Counsel, Government of India For R-2, R-3 & R-5 : Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Special Government Pleader For R-4 : M.r.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Senior Counsel for M/s.Arulvadivel Associates

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.