R. Rajendran v. The Joint Commissioner

ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication.

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

27.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes 2/4_________ To

1.The Joint Commissioner, Srirengam Arulmigu Aranganathaswamy Thirukovil, Srirengam Arulmigu Aranganathaswamy Thirukovil Office, Srirengam, Tiruchirappalli-620 006.

2.The Commissioner, Trichy Corporation, Trichy.

3.Thiru.Murugesan Auction Purchaser Ammamandabam, Srirengam, Tiruchirapalli-620 006. 3/4_________

P.T.ASHA, J. Ns W.P.(MD) No.3314 of 2020 Dated: 27.03.2023 4/4_________

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.(MD) No.3314 of 2020 1.R.Rajendran 2.S.Vijay 3.S.Suresh Kumar 4.N.Anandhan 5.L.Nagarajan 6.R.Ramesh Prabhu 7.C.Satheesh Kumar 8.G.N.Kabilan .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner, Srirengam Arulmigu Aranganathaswamy Thirukovil, Srirengam Arulmigu Aranganathaswamy Thirukovil Office, Srirengam, Tiruchirappalli-620 006. 2.The Commissioner, Trichy Corporation, Trichy. 3.Thiru.Murugesan Auction Purchaser Ammamandabam, Srirengam, Tiruchirapalli-620 006. .. Respondents 1/4_________ Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to do Navithar Work (tonsuring) for the devotees of Srirengam Arulmigu Aranganathaswamy Thirukovil in South Gate, Ammamandabam or in the building constructed by the 2nd respondent dedicated to temple or any other places. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy For R1 : Mr.M.Saravanan For R2 : Mr.K.R.Kishore Ram for M/s.R.B.Law Associates