VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Sarath Raj v. The State of Tamil Nadu,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 February 2025
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRL RC(MD) 158/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Murali Shankar

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Revision Petition is filed seeking orders to modify the condition (1) imposed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, Kanyakumari District in Crl.M.P.No.2294 of 2024, dated

19.10.2024.

¶2The petitioner claims to be the owner of the vehicle Torres Lorry bearing registration No.KL-64-K-9735. On 22.02.2024, the respondent police intercepted the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-64-K-9735 ( viz., 16 Wheel Torres Lorry) Chassis No.MAT808024N3D10848 and seized the vehicle in connection with the case in Crime No.76 of 2024 for the offences under Section 379 of IPC.

¶3It is not in dispute that the petitioner has approached the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, for returning of the said vehicle in Cr.M.P.No.2294 of 2024 and the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, vide order dated 19.10.2024, has allowed the petition with certain conditions that the petitioner shall execute a own bond for Rs.20,00,000/- with two solvent sureties for like sum and on compliance of the conditions, the above vehicle bearing registration No.KL-64-K-9735 shall be returned to the petitioner on interim custody. Challenging the above said condition, the above Criminal Revision came to be filed before this Court.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the value of the vehicle is very low and the first condition to execute a bond for Rs.20,00,000/- is onerous. He would further submit that the petitioner's family is depending upon the income deprived from the above said vehicle.

¶5The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State would submit that the value of the vehicle is around Rs.30 lakhs.

¶6The main grievance of the petitioner is that the conditions imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate in directing the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.20,00,000/- with two solvent sureties for like sum, is onerous and that the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated due to the exposure to sun and rain.

¶7Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the condition No.(1) imposed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, is onerous, this Court is inclined to modify the condition.

¶8In the result, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed. The order of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, made in Cr.M.P.No.2294 of 2024, dated 19.10.2024, is modified in respect of the condition No.(1) alone and it is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) as non-refundable for the vehicle to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Kanyakumari District and the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, and on compliance of the condition, the above vehicle bearing registration No.KL-64-K-9735 shall be returned to the petitioner on interim custody. In respect of other conditions, the order of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, shall remain unaltered.

05.02.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To:-

1.TheDistrict Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.

das Crl.R.C.(MD)No.158 of 2025

05.02.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.158 of 2025 Sarath Raj : Petitioner Vs. State rep.by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Kanyakumari District. Crime No.76 of 2024. : Respondent Prayer : This Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of B.N.S.S., to call for the records and modify the condition (1) imposed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bhoothapandy, Kanyakumari District in Crl.M.P.No.2294 of 2024, dated 19.10.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishna Kumar, For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.