VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vijayabaskar R v. The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition)

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2540/2023

Judgment

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner had addressed a letter dated

20.06.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶2In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

23.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No pnn To

1.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT Division, Allikulam, SIPCOT, Tuticorin - 628 003.

2.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT Division, Harbour Bypass Road, Madathur, Tuticorin-628 003.

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottapidaram Taluk, Ottapidaram, Tuticorin District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn ORDER IN and W.M.P(MD)No. 2316 of 2023

23.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and W.M.P(MD)No. 2316 of 2023 R.Vijayabaskar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT Division, Allikulam, SIPCOT, Tuticorin - 628 003. 2.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT Division, Harbour Bypass Road, Madathur, Tuticorin-628 003. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ottapidaram Taluk, Ottapidaram, Tuticorin District. 4.V.Krishnamoorthy 5. V.Muthulakshmi 6.K.Santhanalakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to pay the compensation to the petitioner as per the 1st respondent`s notification dated 06.10.2021 and the same is published in Dinakaran Daily Nellai Edition by way of considering the petitioner`s representation dated 15.11.2021 and the subsequent reminder representation dated 25.08.2022 with regard to the property situated in Sillanatham Village, Ottapidaram Taluk in Re-Survey No. 259/5 measuring an extent of 2 Acres and 50 Cents, after issuing notice to the respondents 4 to 6 and hearing the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6 based on the Preliminary Decree in O.S.No.23/2014 dated 21.03.2016 and Final Decree in I.A.No.158/2016 in O.S.No.23/2014 dated 07.03.2017, on the file of the Ist Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthikeyan Advocate. For R1 to R3 : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate For R4 to R6 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.