VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Annapackiyam v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 February 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, R. Poornima
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 536/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. IlanthiraiyanFollow R. Poornima

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] The prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent in No. 183/Tha.ku.2/2026 dated 19.01.2026 and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant 15 days emergency leave to the petitioner's husband namely Pandi @ Thangapandi, S/o. Karuppiah, convict prisoner(PID No.65116).

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that her husband was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai in S.C. No.288 of 2015 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 of IPC.. Aggrieved over the same, the convict has also filed an appeal before this Court in Crl.A(MD) No.186 of 2015 and the same was confirmed by this Court. While being so, the petitioner being wife of the convict submitted representation seeking 15 days emergency leave to her husband on the ground that she is suffering from medical illness, however it was rejected on the ground that Rule 35 of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules does not permit to grant any leave since the convict is also facing trial for the offence under Sections 294 (b) and 506(ii) of IPC in STC No.271 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that earlier the husband of the petitioner was granted emergency leave by challenging the rejection order.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that when the convict is facing trial in another case he is not eligible for any leave.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case that earlier the convict was granted leave, this Court is inclined to grant five days emergency leave without escort to convict.

¶6Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the second respondent is set aside and writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The respondents are directed to grant five days emergency without escort to the convict prisoner namely, Pandi @ Thangapandi, S/o. Karuppiah, convict prisoner(PID No.65116) from 12.02.2026 to

16.02.2026. The convict prisoner shall be released from the prison on 12.02.2026 at 9.00 am.,

(ii) He shall report back to the Superintendent of Prison, Central Jail, Madurai / second respondent, by

16.02.2026 at 6.00pm..,

(iii) The petitioner shall produce all necessary documents, along with a copy of this order, before the jail authorities,

(iv) During the leave period, the convict prisoner shall report before the fourth respondent daily at 5.30 pm., without fail. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.]

03.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

aav Note: Issue order copy on 04.02.2026 To:

¶1The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Prisons and Correctional Services Department Madurai Range, Madurai

¶2The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Madurai

¶3The Superintendent of Police Maduri District

¶4The Inspector of Police Saptur Police Station Madurai District

¶5The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. oG.K.ILANTHIRAIYANoo,oJo. and oR.POORNIMAoo,oJo. aav W.P.Crl.(MD)oNo.536oofo2026

03.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA and WMP Crl.(MD) No.139 of 2026 Annapackiyam ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Prisons and Correctional Services Department Madurai Range, Madurai 2. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Madurai 3. The Superintendent of Police Maduri District 4. The Inspector of Police Saptur Police Station Madurai District ..Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide proceedings in No. 183/Tha.ku.2/2026 dated 19.01.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant 15 days emergency leave to the petitioner's husband namely Pandi @ Thangapandi, S/o. Karuppiah, convict prisoner(PID No.65116). For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srikanth For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.