VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

D.Nageswari v. The Commissioner

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 December 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2949/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The present writ petition has been filed by an Overseer in the respondent Department, challenging the order, dated 06.01.2023, wherein, her seniority was fixed from 31.07.2010 instead of 30.07.2010.

¶2According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the petitioner was appointed as an Overseer, by order, dated 30.07.2010 and she had joined duty in the afternoon of 30.07.2010 at Thiruppuvanam Block. However, erroneously the date of joining of service has been recorded as

31.07.2010 and she lost her seniority due to the erroneous recording of the date of joining. Hence, the present writ petition.

¶3A perusal of the Service Register indicates that the petitioner had joined duty through the order of appointment dated 30.07.2010. The petitioner has joined duty only in the forenoon of 31.07.2010. The Service Register further reflects that the petitioner's services have been regularized only with effect from 31.07.2010. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner had joined duty only in the forenoon of 31.07.2010.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner merely relies upon the Attendance Register, in which, it is stated that the petitioner has joined duty in the afternoon of 30.07.2010.

¶5However, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 brings to the notice of this Court that the petitioner's name should have been inserted at serial No.30. However, the petitioner's name has been inserted as serial No.10 and without any counter signature, it is shown that she had joined duty on 30.07.2010.

¶6In view of the above said facts, it is clear that the petitioner had joined duty only in the forenoon of 31.07.2010 and the authorities have rightly fixed the consolidated inter se seniority of the writ petitioner with effect from 31.07.2010. Therefore, there is no error in the order.

¶7Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

21.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶2The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai.

¶3The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Sivagangai.

¶4The Block Development Officer, Thirupuvanam, Sivagangai District. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi W.P(MD)No.2949 of 2023

21.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.2949 of 2023 D.Nageswari ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Chennai. 2. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai. 3. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Sivagangai. 4. The Block Development Officer, Thirupuvanam, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent vide proceedings bearing RC.No.51827/2021/EE2.1, dated 06.01.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to alter the date of joining of the petitioner as 30.07.2010 in the service records instead of 31.07.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavan Kothai Additional Government Pleader For R1 to R3 : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.