VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Pappa v. The Managing Director

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3135/2020

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.(MD) Nos.3135, 3199, 4843 and 4844 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.2667, 2716, 4210 and 4211 of 2020 K.Pappa .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.3135/2020 R.Renganayagi .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.3199/2020 A.Alphonsa .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.4843/2020 R.Balachandran .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.4844/2020 Vs.

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nanthanam, Chennai.

2.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Trichy Housing Unit, Khajamalai Colony, Trichy Town and District-620 020. .. Respondents in all W.Ps. Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to impugned order in Letter No. NIL dated 00.01.2020 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. In all W.Ps. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondents : Mr.M.Suresh Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The above writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners questioning the impugned order passed by the second respondent, in and by which the monthly rent was increased by 300%.

¶2A common counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents (in W.P.(MD) Nos.3048, 3049, 3122 and 3162 of 2020), wherein the second respondent has stated that the rent has been reduced to 50% from the enhanced amount.

¶3In the light of the above, the grievance of the petitioners has been addressed and it is informed that one of the petitioners has vacated the premises and some of them have started paying the revised rent. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in these writ petitions except recording the counter of the respondent (filed in W.P.(MD) Nos.3048, 3049, 3122 and 3162 of 2020). Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

17.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No abr To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nanthanam, Chennai.

2.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Trichy Housing Unit, Khajamalai Colony, Trichy Town and District-620 020.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr W.P.(MD) Nos.3135, 3199, 4843 and 4844 of 2020 Dated: 17.03.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.