- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3678/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondent Bank to return the jewels pledged by the petitioner by considering the representation made by the petitioner on
26.12.2020.
¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank submitted that the petitioner had settled the entire loan amount and the jewels have already been returned back to the petitioner. The petitioner has also given in writing that he will withdraw this writ petition.
¶3In the light of the above development, nothing survives in this writ petition and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs.
12.10.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg N.ANAND VENKATESH, J tsg
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.Babu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Dindigul. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kottanatham Branch, Dindigul District - 624 620. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to return the jewels pledged by the petitioner's name in Jewel Load A/C.No. 406484228208 in the 2nd respondent bank based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.C.Karthik, Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.