- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2023
- Bench
- K.Murali Shankar
- Case no.
- CRL RC(MD) 309/2023
Judgment
ORDER The Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in in Crl.M.P.No.6615 of 2022 in S.T.C.No.189 of 2016, dated 20.12.2022, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi, dismissing the petition to examine the additional witnesses. CRL.R.C.(MD).No.309 of 2023
¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite intimation to the trial Court, the trial Court has proceeded and disposed the case on 06.03.2023. He would further submit that liberty may be given to the petitioner to raise the points now raised in the revision, in the appeal.
¶3Since the trial Court has already disposed of the case, the revision has become infructuous. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise the above points in the appeal. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
24.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To
¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. CRL.R.C.(Mi).No.309oofo2023 K.MURALIoSHANKAR,oJ. das Orderomadeoino CRL.R.C.(MD).No.309oofo2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4464oofo2023
24.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
CRL.R.C.(MD).No.309 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL.R.C.(MD).No.309 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4464 of 2023 S.Mahalakshmi : Petitioner Vs. Jegannathan : Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397(1) r/w 401 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 20.12.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.6615 of 2022 in S.T.C.No.189 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ayyaswamy
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.