VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Selvam T v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3126/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take on file the arbitration petition dated 15.12.2025 filed by the petitioner under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, seeking enhanced compensation for the acquired land of the petitioner in S.Nos.104/5, 104/3, 104/6 and 104/7, situated at Paiyur Village, Pillaivayal Taluk, Sivagangai District and to pass orders granting enhanced compensation along with all other statutory benefits within such time as may be stipulated by this Court.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Page No. 2 of 6

¶3The grievance of the petitioners is that the subject properties belonging to the petitioners were acquired by the Government for the purpose of laying a bypass road around Sivagangai Town in the year 2011.

¶4The District Revenue Officer, vide proceedings dated

19.11.2025, in respect of the land belonging to the first petitioner measuring an extent of 740 sq. mts., determined the compensation at Rs.14,28,863/-, though the market value of the said land was Rs.91,43,440/-. the District Revenue Officer, vide proceedings dated

17.11.2025, in respect of the land belonging to the second petitioner measuring an extent of 663 sq. mts., determined the compensation at Rs.12,80,184/-, though the market value of the said land was Rs.81,92,028/-. The fair compensation ought to have been determined and paid to the petitioners.

¶5Therefore, the petitioners submitted an arbitration petition dated

15.12.2025 under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, seeking enhancement of compensation. Since the same has not been taken Page No. 3 of 6 on file, the petitioners have been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶6The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioners' arbitration appeal dated 15.12.2025 would be taken on file and appropriate orders would be passed by the first respondent within a period of eight weeks.

¶7Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to take on file the arbitration appeal of the petitioners dated 15.12.2025 and to pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The first respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

05.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No Page No. 4 of 6 To

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Land Acquisition Officer / District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai Revenue District, Sivagangai.

3.The Special Tahsildhar, Land Acquisition, Chennai - Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District. Page No. 5 of 6 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

05.02.2026 (2/2) Page No. 6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER 1.T.Selvam 2.S.Karthigai Rani ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Land Acquisition Officer / District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai Revenue District, Sivagangai. 3.The Special Tahsildhar, Land Acquisition, Chennai - Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take on file the Arbitration Petition dated 15.12.2025 filed by the petitioner under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 for enhanced compensation to the acquisition land of the petitioner in S.Nos.104/5, Page No. 1 of 6 104/3, 104/6, 104/7 situated in Paiyur Village, Pillaivayal Taluk, Sivagangai District and to pass an order of enhanced compensation along with the other statutory benefits within the time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Mahaboob Fazil For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.