- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3890/2021
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. By taking note of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.
11.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No RR To The Tahsildar Vadipatti Taluk Office, Madurai District
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
RR W.P.(MD)No.3890 of 2021
11.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :11.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.3890 of 2020 C.Palraj ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar Vadipatti Taluk Office, Madurai District ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.10.2020 for issuing patta within a reasonable time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.C.Vakeeswaran For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.