Vinoth v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Sub Inspector of Police, Theni

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05.02.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

1.Vinoth

¶2Vinoth kumar

¶3Prabakaran

¶4Manikandan

¶5Karuppaiah ... Petitioners/Accused

Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.By, the Sub Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, Theni District. (Crime No.28 of 2026) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian

Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109(1), 296(b) of BNS Act, in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that there was a civil dispute, the petitioners had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him with iron rod due to which, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there is one previous case pending against A3 and others have no previous cases. He further submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that there was a civil dispute and the injured person has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which, the order copy was made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. (S S Y J)

05.02.2026 msrm To

1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, Theni District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY,J msrm

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2232 of 2026

05.02.2026