- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 July 2026
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, K.K. Ramakrishnan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 2879/2023
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.R.SwaminathanFollow K.K. Ramakrishnan
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.) This writ petition was filed in the year 2023. According to the petitioner, the private respondents committed encroachment. He wants them to be removed.
2.When the matter was taken for hearing, the learned counsel for the private respondents submitted that even before filing the writ petition, eviction order dated 22.06.2022 was put to challenge in W.P.(MD)No.4933 of 2023. The Hon'ble Division Bench set aside the said order and allowed the writ petition. Paragraph Nos.4 and 5 of the said order read as follows:-
¶4The order impugned in this writ petition claims that the site in question is classified as "ej;jk; fhypaplk; Nfhtpy;". The said description itself is self-contradictory. It could either be a temple site or a house site, it cannot be both. Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, excludes the lands occupied as house sites, popularly called as Grama Natham and the lands classified as temple sites from its applicability. This Court has time and again reiterated that the Government is not the owner of such lands, which are classified as either temple sites or house sites. Therefore, there cannot be an eviction proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, by the Government, which has no proprietary right over the land in question.
¶5Hence, the writ petition stands allowed. The impugned order dated 22.06.2022, passed by the second respondent, is set aside. It is left open to the fourth respondent to take appropriate proceedings, if he wants to establish his right. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed."
3.In view of the same, no further order is required in this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (G.R.S. J.,) & (K.K.R.K. J.,)
14.07.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:
1.The Thasildhar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.
2.The Block Development Officer, Reddiyarchatram Panchayat Union, Reddiyarchatram, Dindigul.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. ias W.P.(MD)No.2879 of 2023
14.07.2026 (1/2)
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD)No.2879 of 2023 K.Ayyakalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Thasildhar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. 2.The Block Development Officer, Reddiyarchatram Panchayat Union, Reddiyarchatram, Dindigul. 3.Muthusamy 4.Ganeshan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to remove all the encroachment made by the respondents 3 and 4 herein in Prompoke land situated in S.No.216/1, M.Naduppatty, Mangarai Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District by implement the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 22.06.2022 within a stipulated time as prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Marimuthu For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajagopalan, Government Advocate for R1 & R2. Mr.M.Vivek Bharathi for R3 & R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.