VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chinnaponnu. K v. The Commissioner of Land Administration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3583/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the 'Anaadheenam' entry in the revenue records relating to the property situated in Survey Nos. 461/1 and 461/3, Kizhapaguthi Village, Tharagampatti, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2023.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that he purchased the subject property from one Rathinammal. At the time of registration, the registering authority informed that the document would be registered only after obtaining a No Objection Certificate from the revenue authorities. Accordingly, the petitioner's vendor obtained the No Objection Certificate and the document was registered. However, on verification of the revenue records, the petitioner found that the subject property had been wrongly classified as 'Anaadheenam'. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 30.11.2023 to the third respondent seeking removal Page No. 2 of 5 of the erroneous entry. However, no action has been taken thereon. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's representation would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed within a period of sixteen weeks.

¶4Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be disposed of after conducting an enquiry. It is needless to state that before passing such orders, the petitioner and other interested parties, if any, shall be given an opportunity of being heard. No costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

10.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No Page No. 3 of 5 To

1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Karur District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

4.The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District. Page No. 4 of 5 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

10.02.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER K.Chinnaponnu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Karur District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. 4.The Tahsildar, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the entry of Anaadheenam from the property which is situated in S.Nos. 461/1 and 461/3, Kizhapaguthi Village, Tharagampatti, Kadavur Taluk, Karur district by considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2023. Page No. 1 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Satish For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.