- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 356/2023
Judgment
O R D E R A report has been filed that survey had been conducted which indicates compliance of the order passed in the Writ Petition. But however, the land cannot be identified. The petitioner must come out with proper details to get necessary relief from the Court.
¶2Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed.
05.06.2023 Index :Yes / No Internet :Yes NCC : Yes / No RM To
1.The Tahsildar, Theni District - 625 501.
2.The Head Surveyor, Theni Tahsildar Office, Theni.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. RM
05.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN R.Muthaiah ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.Saravanakumar, The Tahsildar, Theni District - 625 501. 2.Guvmariappan, The Head Surveyor, Theni Tahsildar Office, Theni. ...Contemnors/Respondents 1 & 2 PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnors/ respondents 1 and 2 for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P. (MD). N0. 21621 of 2022 dated 13.09.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents :Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.