- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4389/2021
Judgment
O RDER
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner is seeking for allotment of Panchami land.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the written instructions received from the fourth respondent.
3.The fourth respondent has assigned the following reasons as to why the allotment of Panchami land cannot be made in favour of the petitioner: kJiu khtl;lk;> jpUg;guq;Fd;wk; tl;lj;jpy; gQ;rkp epyk; nfhhp <nuhL "
khtl;lk;> gthzp bkapd; nuhL> R.N.g[J}h;> FwpQ;rp efh;> f.vz;.63/45 W.P.(Mi)No.4389oofo2021 vd;w Kfthpiar; nrh;e;j jpUkjp. P. tp$aFkhp> f/bg.jpU.jkpH;bry;td; vd;gth; khz;gik brd;id cah;ePjpkd;w kJiuf; fpisapy; W.P.
(MD)No.4389/2021 tHf;F bjhlhe;Js;shh;. ,t;tHf;F bjhlh;ghf fpuhkf; fzf;Ffis ghrPyid bra;jjpy; jpUg;guq;Fd;wk; tl;lj;jpy; gQ;rkp epyq;fs; gpd;tUkhW cs;sd. t.vz; fpuhkk; g[y vz; Fwpg;g[ 1 thyhnde;jy; 4/1 fpuhkf; fzf;Ffspd;go ,g;g[ykhdJ 2 4/3 gQ;rkh; jhpR vd cs;sJ. 3 epiya{h; gpl; 1 182/2 4 209/3 kDjhuh; FnuhL khtl;lj;ijr; nrh;e;jth; vd;gjhy; mtUila FLk;g bghUshjhu N:H;epiy tpguk;> kDjhuhpd; rhjp kw;Wk; ,ju tpguq;fis mwpa ,aytpy;iy. nkYk; kDjhuh; kJiu khtl;lk; my;yhJ gpwkhtl;lj;ijr; nrh;e;jth; vd;gjhYk; gQ;rkh; epyk; xJf;fPL bra;tJ murstpy; cj;jutplg;gl ntz;Lk; vd;gjhYk; kDjhuh; nfhhpa[s;s nkw;go jpUg;guq;Fd;wk; tl;lk;> thyhnde;jy; kw;Wk; epiya{h; gpl; 1 fpuhkq;fspy; cs;s gQ;rkh; jhpR epyq;fis kDjhuUf;F xJf;fPL bra;a ,ayh epiy cs;sJ vd;gij bjhptpj;Jf; bfhs;fpnwd;."
4.In view of the above, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted by this court. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
12.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai, Madurai District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai, Madurai District.
4.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Tahsildar Office, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD)No.7338 of 2021 P.Vijayakumari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Tahsildar Office, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.08.2020 and on the basis of the information submitted by the fourth respondent dated 06.07.2020 allot Panchami land to the petitioner in Valanenthal Village in Survey Nos.4/1 and 4/3 and in Nilaiyur Pit-I Village in Survey No.182/2 and 209/3 of Thiruparankundram Taluk, Madurai District within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan For Respondents : Mr.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.