VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Arulmithu Udayagiri Sasta Rajarajeswari Devastanam v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 February 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3429/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 3 to grant permission to the petitioner to erect decorative arches during Maasi Festival at Uthayagiri Sastha Rajarajeswari Devastanam situated at Karungal - Thengapattinam State Highway in Keezkulam Village, Killiyur Taluk, Kanyakumari District by considering the representation given by the petitioner on 09.01.2026.

¶2Mrs.S.Jeyapriya, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 3. Mr.A.Albert James, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents 2 and 4.

¶3By consent on either sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a representation on 09.01.2026 for erection of decorative arches during Maasi Festival at Uthayagiri Sastha Rajarajeswari Devastanam situated at Karungal - Thengapattinam State Highway in Keezkulam Village, Killiyur Taluk, Kanyakumari District. However, the same is yet to be considered. Hence, the Writ Petition.

¶5The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 3 would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner will be disposed within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶6In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.01.2026 and dispose of the same, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) days from today i.e., on or before 11.02.2026.

¶7The learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 3 is directed to forthwith inform the respondents 1 and 3 about the direction of this Court to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2026 within a period of two (2) days from today i.e., on or before 11.02.2026.

¶8With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

09.02.2026 Speaking / Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No mbi Note: Issue order copy on 09.02.2026 To

¶1The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

¶2The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

¶3The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶4The Inspector of Police, Pudhukadai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. mbi

09.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Arulmithu Udayagiri Sasta Rajarajeswari Devastanam, Represented by its Secretary, F.S.Jeyaraj, S/o.Francis, 10-136/3, Lakshmi Vilai, Kanyakumari 629 193. ...Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 3. The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Pudhukadai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 and 3 to grant permission to the Petitioner to erect decorative arches during Maasi Festival at Uthayagiri Sastha Rajarajeswari Devastanam situated at Karungal to Thengapattinam State Highway in Keezkulam Village, Killiyur Taluk, Kanyakumari District by considering the representation given by the Petitioner dated 09.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jeyamohan For Respondents : Mrs.S.Jeyapriya, Government Advocate for R1 & R3 Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2 & R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.