- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 February 2026
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 2623/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the learned Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider his bail application and grant bail on the same date of surrender itself in connection with the case in Crime No.15 of 2026, registered on 09.01.2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent police.
¶2Considering the nature of the relief sought for, notice to the 3rd respondent is dispensed with.
¶3Gist of the case: The third respondent has given a complaint as against the petitioners herein. The third respondent's daughter namely Nikitha and one Boopathi/A1 were in love for nearly 8 years. Now the petitioners are arranging the marriage of the first accused with some other woman. When the same was questioned by the daughter of the third respondent, the petitioners / accused Nos.1 to 3 insulted her. Hence the complaint in Crime No.15 of 2026 has been registered for the offences under Sections 296(b), 318(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023, read with Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.
¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.
¶5Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, this Court hereby directs the learned Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Madurai, to issue prior notice to the de facto complainant and thereafter to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender before that Court in connection with Crime No.15 of 2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent police. The petitioner shall surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
10.02.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no pnn Note: Issue order copy on 12.02.2026 To
¶1The Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Madurai.
¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
¶3The Inspector of Police, SS Colony Police Station, Madurai District, Crime No. 15/2026.
¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of madras High Court, Madurai. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ pnn ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD)oNo.2623oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o10/02/2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 10/02/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI 1. Boopathiraja, 2. Sangeetha, 3. Monisha, ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep, By the Deputy Superintendent of Police,, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, SS Colony Police Station, Madurai District, Crime No. 15/2026. 3. Jamuna ... Respondents PRAYER :- To direct the learned Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider his bail application and grant bail on the same date of surrender itself in connection with the case in Crime No.15 of 2026, registered on 09.01.2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent police for alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 318(2) and 351(2) of BNS Act, 2023 r/w Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. For Petitioner : Mr. K.M.Priscilla Jancy, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.