Thangavel v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

19.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Ls To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Inspector of police Malaiyur Police Station, Malaiyur, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J Ls Dated : 19.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Thangavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Inspector of police Malaiyur Police Station, Malaiyur, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.Periyathambi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2, to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 06.02.2023, forbearing the third respondent from putting up any shed, or stage in front yard and pathway bearing S.No.150/15 of Malaiyur Village, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District in front of the petitioner's house, for cultural programme held from 02.02.2023 to 18.02.2023. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor for R1&2 : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu for R3