VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Thangavelu. A v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 February 2023
Bench
P.D.Audikesavaluauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3652/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

1.A.Thangavelu ... Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 3652 of 2023

2.M.Murugan ... Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 3653 of 2023 Vs.

¶1The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Thousand Lights West, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034..

¶2The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 450, Muthusamy Nagar, Thirupattur Road, Sivagangai – 630 561.

¶3The Hereditary Trustee, Five Temple Devasthanam Head Office, Kundrakudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Common Prayer:- Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider the petitioners' representations dated 05.07.2022 and 01.08.2022 and reinstate petitioners as Vairavi to the service of the Arulmighu Shanmuganatha Perumal Thirukkovil, Kundrakudi, within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner in both : Ms. A.S.Rajeswari Writ Petitions For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. P.Subbaraj, in both Writ Petitions Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.3 : Mr. VR.Shanmuganathan in both Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER Heard Ms. A.S.Rajeswari, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. P.Subbaraj, Learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the First and Second Respondents and Mr. VR.Shanmuganathan, who takes notice for the Third Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶2These Writ Petitions have been filed for directing the Respondents to consider the representations dated 05.07.2022 and 01.08.2022 made by the Petitioners to re-instate them as 'Vairavi' in the services of the Arulmighu Shanmuganatha Perumal Thirukkovil, Kundrakudi, within a time frame.

¶3In response to the said claim made, Learned Counsel for the Third Respondent has filed a memo dated 24.02.2023, which reads as follows:- "01. The Writ Petitioners claim "Vairavi" Service in the 3rd respondent Temple.

¶02The family members of petitioners were rendering "Vairavi" service in Arulmighu Shanmuganatha Samy Thirukovil, Kundrakudi. Service relates to taking care of security of the temple. They are not paid servants of the temple. It is a service for honorarium. They would receive some per quisites in the form of prasadam etc., for the service.

¶03On 24.03.2005, the family members of petitioners committed theft of Hundial and jewels in the temple, in respect of which criminal case in Cr.No.102 of 2005 on the file of Kundrakudi Police Station which culminated to C.C.No. 194 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, Crl.App.No. 6 of 2011, on the file of the learned Session Judge, Sivagangai, Cr.RC.MD.No. 518 of 2012 before the Hon'ble court and out of 4 accused, two were acquitted giving benefit of doubt and for the other two conviction was confirmed and had become final though sentence was modified.

¶04Be that as it may, after the incident on 24.03.2005, temple administration had dispensed with the Vairavi Service in the temple and had engaged Private security Services, which is continuing till date. Therefore there is a break in Vairavi Service for more than 18 years. Further in view of 1971 amendment introducing section 55(2) to Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, hereditary succession to any service holder or any employee is abolished. Therefore petitioners, as of right to succeed cannot make any claim, in view of the specific bar. Hence, the above Writ Petition is not maintainable both on facts and on law and deserves dismissal." In view of the abolition of the hereditary appointment of the Vairavi services in the Temple of the Third Respondent, it would not be possible to direct the Respondents to pass orders on the representations dated 05.07.2022 and

01.08.2022 made by the Petitioners in these cases. In the result, the Writ Petitions, which cannot be entertained, is dismissed. No costs.

24.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes /No SJ Note: Issue order copy by 22.06.2023 To

¶1The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Thousand Lights West, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

¶2The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 450, Muthusamy Nagar, Thirupattur Road, Sivagangai - 630561.

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J. SJ Dated : 24.02.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.