Natarajan v. The District Revenue Officer

O RDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous.

2.Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

13.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To

1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.District Revenue Office, Thiruchirappalli, Thrichy District, Thirchy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruchirappali, Thirchy District, Thirchy.

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.Thashildar, Thiruvembur, Thiruchirappalli, Thirchy District, Thirchy.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta

13.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH 1.Natarajan 2.Hemalatha ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.District Revenue Office, Thiruchirappalli, Thrichy District, Thirchy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruchirappali, Thirchy District, Thirchy. 3.The Tahsildar, O/o.Thashildar, Thiruvembur, Thiruchirappalli, Thirchy District, Thirchy. 4.Malliga Patel 5.V.Anbukumar 6.P.Veeriah 7.M.Manohar 8.Naryanan K.Patel 9.Ramesh Patel 10.Vignesh Purushotham Patel 11.Kishore Kumar K.Patel 12.Thulasi Das K.Patel 13.Nareesh H.Patel 14.Sankar H.Patel 15.Poorjima Patel ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to the respondents 1 to 3 to effect mutation in the revenue records as per proceedings of the Assistant Inspector General of Registration in Moo.Mu.No.4843/Aa4/2019 dated 20.05.2020. For Petitioners : Mr.C.Mahadevan For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate