VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthusamy v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 April 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3177/2023

Judgment

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 and their subordinate to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dated 30.11.2022.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the representation that was made by the petitioner enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, it was found that a civil suit is pending between the parties before the District Munsif's Court, Dindigul. Undertaking was also given by both the parties as not to make any trouble with each other till the disposal of the above said pending suit. On that ground it was closed.

3.In view of the above said development, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

05.04.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM

05.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Muthusamy ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. Kumaravadivel ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 and their subordinate to give adequate police protection for the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dated 30.11.2022. For petitioner : Mr. Venkatesh.D For Respondents : Mr.R.Sureshkumar for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.