- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4900/2021
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous at this length of time.
2.In view of the same, nothing survives for further consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No PNM To The Commissioner, Ramanathapuram Municipality, Ramanathapuram District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. PNM ORDER IN and W.M.P(MD)No.3977 of 2021
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P(MD)No.3977 of 2021 G.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs The Commissioner, Ramanathapuram Municipality, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records relating to impugned Order passed by the respondent in his Proceedings in Na.Ka.No.212/2018/A2, dated 25.02.2021 and quash the same as illegal For Petitioner : Mr.K. Rajeshwaran For Respondent : Mr. A.Kannan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.