- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3879/2022
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The petitioner purchased the petition mentioned property vide sale deed dated 21.05.2007 from one Kuppuraj and others. The third respondent Thangammal is none other than the sister of the said Kuppuraj. She lodged a complaint before the second respondent that the execution of the aforesaid sale deed in favour of the petitioner was fraudulent. For cancelling the said document, the impugned enquiry notice dated 14.02.2022 has been issued by the first respondent. During the relevant time, there was no circular holding the filed authorizing the first respondent to conduct such enquiry. Section 77A of the Act that was introduced in the statute book cannot operate retrospectively.
¶3The third respondent is said to have filed civil suit for enforcing her rights. The third respondent has to pursue her remedy only in the pending civil suit. The impugned notice is patently without jurisdiction.
¶4Granting liberty to the third respondent to pursue her remedy in the pending civil suit in O.S.No.119 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Court, Madurai, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Registrar (Admin) Office of the District Registrar, Madurai.
2.The Sub Registrar, Tirumangalam, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
04.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.3346 of 2022 Gandhimathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Admin) Office of the District Registrar, Madurai. 2.The Sub Registrar, Tirumangalam, Madurai District. 3.Thangammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent dated 14.02.2022 in proceedings Na.Ka.No.8673/B2/2021, quash the same, as the same is arbitrary, ultravires, in excess of power. For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Balaji for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.