- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 March 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 315/2023
Judgment
ORDER None appears for the petitioner.
¶2The learned Additional Government Pleader informs the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
¶3The contempt petition is closed.
20.03.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To
1.The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District.
2.The Taluk Surveyor, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District. Cont. P(MD)No.315 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16938 of 2022
Case details
Parties and counsel
Cont. P(MD)No.315 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.315 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16938 of 2022 G.Ramasubramani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.R.Babu, The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District. 2.Balasubramaniam, The Taluk Surveyor, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their willfully disobeying and non-complying with the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.16938 of 2022, dated 01.08.2022. For Petitioner : no appearance For Respondent : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader Cont. P(MD)No.315 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.