VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Elavarasan, v. Dr.S.Aneesh Sekhar, I.A.S.,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 395/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) The Advocate Commissioner appointed has filed a report stating that the encroachments in Survey Nos.323/1A, 323/1B2, 323/1B1B1B1, 323/2A1A1, 323/2B have been removed.

¶2The order, according to the Tahsildar, was complied in its letter and spirit. Since this fact was disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we had appointed Mr.P.Kiran Prakash, an Advocate practicing in this Bench as a Commissioner to visit the area in question and file a report. The Advocate Commissioner has filed a report stating that the encroachments in those survey numbers have, in fact, been removed, but the Commissioner has also pointed out that such removal alone will not be helpful to the petitioner as his land is landlocked with patta lands and removal of the encroachment in those survey numbers would not serve the purpose or provide passage to the petitioner to his house. Hence, we see no reason to proceed with the contempt petition.

¶3The Contempt Petition is therefore closed. (R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) & (L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.)

27.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

Internet : Yes bala

Cont.P(MD)No.395eofe2023

R.SUBRAMANIAN , J. and

L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J. balagg DATED : 27.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI R.Elavarasan ... Petitioner vs. 1. Dr.S.Aneesh Sekhar IAS, The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. Mrs.Dhanalakshmi, The Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravidar Welfare), Adi Dravidar Welfare Unit I, Madurai District. 3. Mr.Veerapathiran, The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai Taluk. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor/respondent and punish him for the wilful disobedience of the order of the High Court in W.P(MD)No.1698 of 2022 dated 28.10.2022. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathi Roy and Associates For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.