VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Nagasankari v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 February 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 2989/2026

Judgment

ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection based on the petitioner's online complaint dated

29.01.2026 in accordance with law.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this criminal original petition has been filed seeking to direct the second respondent to provide police protection based on the petitioner's online compliant dated

29.01.2026 for the purpose of survey the land situated in S.No.442/9 in Melachorikulam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk. On 02.01.2026, survery was conducted in the said land. However, one Malaisamy, Ramakrishnan and four others intervened and disturbed the peaceful conduct of the survey and hence, the survey was not fully concluded. In this regard, the petitioner requires immediate police protection for the peaceful conduct of survey in the said land and hence, he had given a representation on 29.01.2026. The inaction of the respondent police has compelled the petitioner to file this Criminal Original Petition.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that after the complaint received from the petitioner, the second respondent police required both the parties and conducted an inquiry and directed the petitioner to approach the Taluk Surveyor. If the request is raised by the Taluk Surveyor for affording police protection, they are ready to give protection. However, there was no follow up and the same was closed. Subsequently, the petitioner had filed a writ petition before this Court in WP(MD)No.35437 of 2025 in which this Court by the order dated 10.12.2025, directed the Taluk Surveyor to conduct survey within a period of eight weeks. However, so far, the second respondent police did not receive any intimation from the Taluk Surveyor requiring police protection. If at all the Taluk Surveyor requires police protection, they are ready to afford the same.

¶4Heard both sides and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶5In this regard, to facilitate the Taluk Surveyor from complying with the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.35437 of 2025, the petitioner is directed to make a suitable application before the 4th respondent and pay necessary fee for survey and Mr.T.Amjed Khan, learned counsel takes notice for the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent/Taluk Surveyor, on receipt of the application, is required to conduct a survey in compliance with the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.35437 of 2025. If at all, any obstruction or disturbance is caused by any private persons, the Taluk Surveyor is directed to require ofr appropriate police protection from the 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent, on receipt of requisition from the 4th respondent, is directed to afford necessary police production on payment of the necessary fee by the petitioner in terms of G.O.(Ma).No.139, Home (Pol-VIII) Department, dated

04.03.2019 and the respondent police is directed to provide the required protection on the specified date upon receipt of such payment.

¶6With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

13.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No

Index : Yes / No dss To:-

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Palayanoor Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Tahsildhar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. dss Dated

13.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Nagasankari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Palayanoor Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildhar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District. 4.The Taluk Surveyor, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection based on the petitioner's online complaint dated 29.01.2026 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4 : Mr.T.Amjedkhan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.