Vimaladevi v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] Pursuant to the order dated 17.03.2023, when the Habeas Corpus Petition is taken up for hearing today, the respondent police has produced the detenue before this Court.

¶2When we enquired, she has stated that she is a major running 20 years. Admittedly, she claimed to have married the third respondent, namely, Vijay, S/o.Bose and they were hitherto residing at Karnataka and now she wanted to go to the matrimonial home, ie., the third respondent's house, as the parents of the third respondent accepted the marriage but not the parents of the detenue, ie., the petitioner herein. The detenue also apprehends that there may be some life threat from the side of the petitioner or the family or relatives of the detenue and therefore, she seeks police protection, for which, we have advised her to give proper complaint before the jurisdictional police.

¶3In view of the afore-stated, since there has been no illegal custody, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

(R.S.K.,J.) (K.K.R.K.,J.)

20.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes RR To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

R.SURESH KUMAR,J. and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J. RR

HCP.(MD)No.260 of 2023

20.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.03.2023 CORAM The Honourable Mr. Justice R.SURESH KUMAR and The Honourable Mr. Justice K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.260 of 2023 Vimaladevi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Police Station, Madurai District. 3.Vijay 4.Bose 5.Muthu 6.Ramuthayee .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter namely Sindhu daughter of Muthu aged about 20 years before this Court from the illegal custody of the respondents No.3 to 6 and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor