J.Jeyakumar, v. Suseela,

JUDGMENT Since there was no representation for the appellants for the past four hearings, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

29.08.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm A.S.(MD)No.43 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1725 of 2022

A.S.(MD)No.43 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.08.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR A.S.(MD)No.43 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1725 of 2022 1. J.Jeyakumar 2. S.Manohar @ Samuel 3. S.Baskar 4. S.Sudhakar ... Appellants/ Defendants Vs. Suseela ... Respondent/ Plaintiff Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2018 allowing the suit made in O.S.No.64 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Tuticorin and allow this appeal. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Kadarkarai A.S.(MD)No.43 of 2022 K.MURALI SHANKAR ,J. csm