VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Premalatha v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4252/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to carry out the appropriate survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's lands situated in Survey Nos.209/12, 209/3, 209/8, 209/9, 239/15, 245/2, 256/15, 256/4, 256/8, 407/1, 408/7, 408/8B, 256/3 and 477/8 at Malampatti Village, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District, based on the petitioner's

survey

Application

No.2026/0123/23/000255

and 2026/N123/23/000109, dated 22.01.2026 and subsequent representation dated

02.02.2026, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject properties. The petitioner submitted applications dated 22.01.2026, requesting survey and fixation of the boundaries of the said properties. Despite the same, the respondents have failed to take any action, causing undue delay and prejudice to the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, seeks a direction to the respondents to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that proper steps would be taken to survey and demarcate the land in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

¶5Recording the aforesaid submission, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's applications dated 22.01.2026 and demarcate the subject properties, after considering the claims of the petitioner, and any other rival parties, if any, and to pass orders in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the Civil Court.

¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

16.02.2026 smn2 To:-

1.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Department of Land Survey, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

16.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Premalatha ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2.The Head Surveyor, Department of Land Survey, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to carry out the appropriate survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's lands situated in Survey Nos.209/12, 209/3, 209/8, 209/9, 239/15, 245/2, 256/15, 256/4, 256/8, 407/1, 408/7, 408/8B, 256/3 and 477/8 at Malampatti Village, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District, based on the petitioner's survey Application No. 2026/0123/23/000255 and 2026/N123/23/000109, dated 22.01.2026 and subsequent representation dated 02.02.2026, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Paramasivam For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhiyan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.