VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ilangovan v. The Authorized Officer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2023
Bench
D. Krishnakumar, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 3742/2023

Judgment

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] Challenging the E-Auction Sale Notice dated 26.01.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent, this Writ Petition is filed with a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to restructure the loan after deducting the penal interest.

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents informed this Court that the petitioner has settled the entire outstanding amount to the respondents.

3.In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Therefore, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [D.K.K., J.] & [L.V.G., J.]

27.02.2023

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MYR D.KRISHNAKUMAR,oJ. AND oL.VICTORIAoGOWRIoo,o oJo. MYR W.P.(MD)No.3742oofo2023

27.02.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.(MD)No.3742 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3520 and 3521 of 2023 Ilangovan ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Authorized Officer, Devan Housing Finance Corporation Limited, Re-gam Plaza, 1st Floor, 111-112, Alagarkovil Main Road, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 002. 2.Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd., (Formerly known as DHFCL), No.171A, 171, ALDR Avenue, Rajanaidu Road, Sivanantha Colony, Coimbatore. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 26.01.2023 scheduled on 27.02.2023 between 11.00 AM to 02.00 PM published by the 2nd respondent in Dhina Mani Tamil Daily Newspaper on 27.01.2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to restructure the loan after deducting the penal interest. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi For Respondents : Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.