Manoj Kumar.G v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the the 1st and 2nd respondents not to harass the petitioner.

2.Even though notice has been served upon the third respondent, none appears on behalf of him.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint received from the third respondent enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both parties have given undertakings. Based upon the above said undertakings the complaint was closed.

4.Even though the counsel for the petitioner made objection with regard to the above said undertakings, nothing survives in view of the above said closure. The prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.

5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

11.04.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM

11.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN G.Manoj Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. 3.R.Deepika ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents not to harass the petitioner. For petitioner : Mr.V.Alageshkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)