- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 March 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 391/2023
Judgment
O R D E R It is reported by the learned Special Government Pleader for the contemnor that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by negativing the petitioner's application. It is for the petitioner to question the rejection order in the manner known to law.
2.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.
30.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- Rajendran, Tahsildhar, Taluk Office, Thisaiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.391 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.13314 of 2022
30.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.391 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.13314 of 2022 M.Sankar ... Petitioner Vs. Rajendran, Tahsildhar, Taluk Office, Thisaiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District. ... Contemnor Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor/ 2nd Respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in WP(MD).No.13314 of 2022 on 05.08.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar, For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.