- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2026
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 3228/2026
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Muthukumar, S/o.Vellaisamy, Sirunathanvayal, Kongudi, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.. ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Awps-Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. Crime No.3 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Adithya Vijayalayan for Mr.D.Venkatesh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-38B. For Bail in Crime no.3 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 64, 318(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.3 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on
03.06.2025, the petitioner and his parents visited the victim girl's house with a marriage proposal and the proposal was not succeeded. Thereafter, she voluntarily called upon him over phone and they were talking with each other very often. During such period, the petitioner on false promise of marriage, had sexual intercourse with the victim girl due to which, she became pregnant. Hence, the complaint.
3.After
considering
the
facts
and circumstances, this Court has already granted interim bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and listed the matter today with regard to the DNA Test.
¶4When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that they are awaiting the result of the DNA test.
¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent, nature of offence, and considering the fact that they are awaiting the result of the DNA test and no previous case is pending against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from
22.01.2026, this Court is inclined to confirm the interim bail already granted by this Court.
6.Accordingly, the interim bail already granted is made absolute and the petitioner shall report before the respondent once in a month ie., on the first working day of Every English Calender month at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and all other conditions imposed on the petitioner shall remain intact. Thus, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered. (P D B J)
02.06.2026 VSG TO
1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi.
2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai District.
3.The Superintendent, District Jail, Ramanathapuram.
4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. CRLeOP(MD).eNo.3228eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeP.eDHANABAL,J., eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevsge eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeORDER eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeIN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCRLeOP(MD)eNo.3228eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeDateee:e02/06/2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.