- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 February 2023
- Bench
- D. Krishnakumar, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4015/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] In view of the fact that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai is functioning once in a week, we are inclined to entertain this Writ Petition.
¶2Challenging the impugned E-auction sale notice dated 25.01.2023 issued by the 1st respondent, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the respondents - Bank submitted that there is no bidder in the auction conducted by the respondents bank and therefore, the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous.
¶4Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition is dismissed. In respect of the allegations made in the writ petition with regard to the manner in which the respondents Bank has conducted the sale is concerned, it is for the petitioner to approach the Deputy Recovery Tribunal for appropriate remedy. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[D.K.K., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
27.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm D.KRISHNAKUMAR
, J.
and
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. vsm To The District Educational Officer (Elementary Education), Theni, Theni District.
27.02.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD)No.3892 of 2023 Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Manager / Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Bodinayakkanur, Theni District. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Thevaram Branch, Theni District. 3.The District Educational Officer (Elementary Education), Theni, Theni District. 4.The Headmaster, Union Middle School, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 5.Raguvarman 6.Palpandian ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned E-auction sale notice dated 25.01.2023 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bharathy Kannan For Respondents : Mr.R.Pandivel, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mr.J.Anand, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.