VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Palanisamy v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4470/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first to third respondents to cancel the separate patta in Patta No.2875 and to issue a joint patta including the names of the petitioner and his sister in respect of S.No.85/6F1B, Nammanpatti Village, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2025, within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself, dispensing with the notice to the fourth respondent, as no adverse orders are proposed to be passed against him.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the total extent of the property in S.No.85/6F1 is 1.39.0 hectares and the same is an ancestral Page No. 2 of 5 property. Out of the said extent, 79 cents was gifted to the petitioner's father and the remaining extent continues to be ancestral and undivided. On 07.05.2024, S.No.85/6F1 was subdivided into S.Nos.85/6F1A and 85/6F1B measuring about 32.50 ares and the fourth respondent has illegally obtained a separate patta in his individual name. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 05.12.2025 to the first to third respondents seeking cancellation of the separate patta and issuance of a joint patta including the names of the petitioner and his sister. However, the same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first to third respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2025 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed by the second respondent within a period of sixteen weeks.

¶5Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's Page No. 3 of 5 representation dated 05.12.2025 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be disposed of after conducting an enquiry. The second respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and any other interested parties who may be affected by such decision, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

18.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Illupur Revenue Division, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Tahsildar, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. Page No. 4 of 5 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

18.02.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER R.Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Illupur Revenue Division, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4.Duraisamy ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first to third respondents to cancel the separate patta in Patta No.2875 and to issue the joint patta including the petitioner's name and his sister's name in respect of S.No. 85/6F1B of Nammanpatti Village, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2025 within time frame fixed by this Court. Page No. 1 of 5 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader ****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.