Vijaykumar Thondaman.R v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner's mother died, the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

01.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate,

¶2The Superintendent of Police, O/o. District Superintendent,

¶3The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶5The Inspector of Police, Condonement Police Station,

01.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3726, 3728 and 5564 of 2023 R.Vijayakumar Thondaman ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, 2. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. District Superintendent, 3. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, 5. The Inspector of Police, Condonement Police Station, 6. Charubala 7. Janaki Manokari ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to protect the petitioner's mother and recover from respondent No.6 and ensure the life as per Section 20 of Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules 2009. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathi Roy and Associates For R1 to R5 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader For R6 : Mr.K.R.Nishanth For R7 : Mr.S.Venkatesh