VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Surendran v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Commissioner of Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 903/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conduct the enquiry and dispose petitioner representations dated 18.12.2025 and 12.02.2026 in the file second respondent within time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had given a complaint / representations dated 18.12.2025 and 12.02.2026 before the second respondent police. However, the second respondent has not taken any action on his representations.

¶3Learned Government Advocate submitted that enquiry is pending on the petitioner's complaint which has been made for the offence of job racketing.

¶4It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶5In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated

18.12.2025 and 12.02.2026, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner, as well as all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the respondents to consider the same on its own merits.

¶6With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

26.03.2026 NCC : Index : pnn To

¶1The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch Police Station, Uraiyur, Trichy District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,J ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopnnoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooWPoCRL.(MD)oNo.903oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o26/03/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26/03/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI Surendran ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.By The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch Police Station, Uraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conduct the enquiry and dispose petitioner representation dated on 18.12.2025 and 12.02.2026 in the file 2nd respondent within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : J.Mohamed Ibrahim, Advocate. For Respondent : M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side),

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.